Diabetes Research - Insulin, Type I, Type II, Diet, Treatment, Prevention

Diabetes Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Diabetes, including details on insulin, type i, type ii, diet, treatment, prevention.


Diabetes Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Diabetes

Books on Diabetes

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Cardiovascular disease risk prediction in type 1 diabetes: accounting for the differences.

Ruppert K, Roberts MS, Orchard TJ, Zgibor JC

Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Ruppertkm@upmc.edu

Present analyses used data from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study, a prospective study of subjects with childhood type 1 diabetes (T1D), diagnosed between 1950 and 1980. Baseline exams took place 1986-1988 with biennial exams since. The Framingham risk equation was applied to generate the probability of risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) (MI, CHD death, or Q-waves) in 552 CHD free subjects who experienced 42 events over the 10-year follow-up period. Probabilities were split in to deciles. Expected and observed events were compared and demonstrated poor prediction. Risk factors previously found to be associated with CHD in T1D other than those in the Framingham risk function (age, smoking, cholesterol/HDLc, systolic blood pressure) were compared within the highest risk deciles. In men, elevated fibrinogen (p=0.007), white blood cell count (WBC) (p=0.037), albumin excretion rate (AER) (p=0.0001), and lower HDLc (p=0.048) were predictive. In females, higher Beck Depression Inventory (p=0.008), HbA1 (p=0.008), AER (p=0.01), LDLc (p=0.007), fibrinogen (p=0.006), WBC (p=0.005), non-HDLc (p=0.0005), WHR (p=0.003), and estimated glucose disposal rate (p=0.002) were associated. Risk factors not considered by the Framingham risk equation may account for the lack of fit and should be examined further.

Published 1 October 2007 in Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 78(2): 234-7.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Diabetes Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Diabetes Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (November)
  Issue 2 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)



Diabetes Books

The Ultimate Guide to Accurate Carb Counting: Featuring the Tools and Techniques Used by the Experts (Marlowe Diabetes Library)

The Ultimate Guide to Accurate Carb Counting: Featuring the Tools and Techniques Used by the Experts (Marlowe Diabetes Library)